Something that really stuck out to me while reading Poe was his use of the narrator as an outstanding character in his stories. In a way we haven't quite seen yet in our readings this semester the narrator of each of Poe's stories has an incredibly important voice.
In Cooper's The Last of the Mohicans, the narrator played an important role but it wasn't nearly as present as as Poe's narrators, and it often contributed very different things to the story. His input was often minimal and relatively distant. The narrator functions as an observer who is passing on the tales of the war time stories, and sometimes expresses opinion, but whose function is ultimately to tell the story. In Emerson's writings, there is not a narrator as they are essays, however his voice is extremely prominent and his opinions and thoughts carry his writing. Throughout his essays he seems to establish his personal search and the search that everyone reading his works should take for a higher form of American culture (among many other things).
However, Poe uses his narrator differently. The narrator in Poe's stories are often involved in the stories, they are the protagonist and yet somehow we don't know all that much about them. In every one of his stories the narrator remains unnamed (except for in William Wilson where he makes clear that William Wilson is not his name). The difference between the other writers' narrators and Poe's is that Poe's narrators move the story along, they tell the story from within it, and seem to each narrator seems to somehow be ever-present. Even Poe's sentence structure seems to call attention to his narrator, for example in The Fall of the House of Usher he writes, "I shall ever bear about me, as Moslemin their shrouds at Mecca, a memory of the many solemn hours I thus spent alone with the master of the House of Usher. I should fail in any attempt to convey an idea of the exact characteristics of the study, or of the occupations, in which he involved me, or led the way" (658). In just two sentences he references himself five times. I find this interesting, because it seems as though Poe wants to convey his story through the eyes of someone, in an emotional tale, rather than a factual account. The Masque of the Red Death is the only story we read for today that contains a more passive narrator. I find it interesting that Poe uses this device, because it definitely heightens the suspense of the story if we can be emotionally invested in a character, and absolutely builds on the Gothic genre for which Poe is infamous.
I'm really glad you brought this up, because Poe's present-yet-not-present narrators stood out to me too. I think you're right that they make the stories more emotional; if anything, having a vague narrator who is present during the action, but does not play a central role, can allow the reader to slip into the narrator's shoes– so to speak. We know so little about the narrator, we can take their place in the story as the horrified observer of unspeakable events. Perhaps the reason there is no first person narrator in "The Masque of the Red Death" is because everyone present for the events of the story ends up dead– so any first person narrator would have to be speaking to us from beyond the grave.Then again, that sounds like a pretty interesting concept... and not exactly one from which Poe would shy away...
ReplyDelete"William Wilson" might be narrated from beyond the grave, if we think of the narrator's double as really a part of himself, which the story certainly allows you to believe. Interestingly, Dickinson has several poems that are in some sense narrated from beyond the grave.
ReplyDeleteI was actually thinking about bringing up the first person narrator in class and how this point of view requires that the narrator be alive at the end of the story, but then I remembered "William Wilson" and couldn't justify the use of a first person narrator in that story since I do believe that "Wilson" kills himself in the end. I hadn't thought about how practical the third person narrator is in "The Masque" until I read Sarah's post, I just thought it was a random outlier. I'm not sure why Poe used a first person narrator in "William Wilson" if his intention (excuse the fallacy) was for "Wilson" to accidentally kill himself. Maybe just to surprise the reader at the end?
ReplyDelete