One important question Narrative Life of Frederick Douglass raises
is the extent to which the memoir encompasses an individual and collective experience. While
Fredrick Douglass recounts his personal journey from enslavement to freedom,
there are many moments in the memoir in which he describes slaves’ collective
struggle and implies that identifying with his fellow slaves is a form of
empowerment.
Douglass’ close relationship with Mr.
Freeland’s other slaves highlights his propensity to identify with others who experience the same conditions. He describes himself and his fellow
slaves as “linked and interlinked with each other” and writes that he “loved
them with a love stronger than any thing I have experienced since” (1219). His
description of the intense and enduring emotional connection he shares with
them suggests he views them not only as a community, but also as a kind of
metaphorical family that transcends blood relations. Part of this connection is
rooted in the slaves’ shared experience and subjection to horrific physical and emotional hardship; however, he also implies that his relationship with other
slaves makes him feel safe and protected. Douglass writes that
the slaves “never moved separately,” and that he is “anxious to have them participate with
me in this, my life-giving determination [to secure freedom from enslavement]”
(1219).
Despite his desire to secure all of the
slaves’ freedom, Douglass’ first attempt to organize a collective escape
ultimately fails, and his ambiguous account of his successful journey to
freedom implies that he was braves it alone. Interestingly, when Douglass first
reaches freedom in the North, he describes himself as “in the midst of thousands, and yet a
perfect stranger” and he feels displaced without the support and comfort of his
fellow slaves. Furthermore, he exhibits a fear of strangers that has been
engrained in him from his interactions with untrustworthy, white southerners.
He sees “in every white man an enemy, and in almost every colored cause for
distrust” because his traumatic experiences have taught him that he can only
rely on the other slaves. While Douglass’ culminating achievement of freedom
seems like an individual act, his escape enables him to record—in writing and
speech—the tragedies he and his fellow slaves experienced together. His freedom
also allows him to work toward freeing all enslaved African Americans. He never
fully becomes disconnected from the slaves he grew up with despite his physical
dislocation from the South.
The idea of tracing instances of collectivity and the individual is incredibly fascinating. You've pointed out a tension that definitely seems to continue throughout the story. I'm sure there are many, many more instances. This also seems like yet another line Douglass would have had to walk writing writing his story; how to create something that is a symbol for the collective horrors of slavery, but true to the individual?
ReplyDeleteI agree that this is a really interesting idea and tension. It reflects the idea that Douglass needs at once to assert and reveal that he is no longer a slave, is "true to myself" and an idea of the individual as distinct self, and that he is fighting for the community of slaves whose condition he still understands and is deeply sympathetic for.
ReplyDelete