Monday, April 20, 2015

Women in "The Goophered Grapevine" and "Po' Sandy"

In "The Goophered Grapevine" and "Po' Sandy," the women are capable of conjuring and lead the plot along. In "The Goophered Grapevine," the woman who spells the grapes is responsible for the entire story because she is the one responsible for Henry's seasonal transformations that drive his and his master's plot. Though her magical contributions to the story are so important, she is not. Rather than flesh her out with details, Chesnutt keeps her character one dimensional as the "cunjuh 'oman." Similarly, Tenie in "Po' Sandy" is mostly valued for her magical contribution to the story. Chesnutt gives her more details than the first woman, but Tenie too is defined by her magical ability. By primarily writing the two black women to conjurers, Chesnutt doesn't really address the horrors women faced during slavery: separation from their children and families, rape, forced breeding, etc. Tenie is described as loving Sandy very much while his first wife is barely given a sentence. Women don't even talk to each other during these two stories; they only talk to men and try to make their lives easier, firmly aligning their characters with caring or mothering qualities. Miss Annie is also written as caring, it's one reason she always falls for Uncle Julius's stories. She not only listens to his stories, but tries to make his woes disappear (giving him the schoolhouse and ham).

4 comments:

  1. Really great observations. Chesnutt definitely puts the women in his stories in an interesting light. I was surprised by how central the role of conjuring was in the first three stories we read, but it's interesting that those powers are attributed to women, even though it does distract from the real life turmoils that women in this time period would have faced.

    ReplyDelete
  2. You're completely right in this. I imagine that more women than men were "conjun"-gifted in the oral storytelling tradition, but in endowing his female characters with these traits Chesnutt makes them somewhat superhuman — while, at the same time, "inferior" to whites. It is an interesting irony.

    ReplyDelete
  3. You make a really good point, and I also like what Leslie said about the women's magical abilities as almost making them superior to men– despite their scarce role in the stories. I think the narrator's wife also plays into this; the narrator constantly defers to her, not only when she's sick, but when she spontaneously decides she needs a new kitchen, etc. The woman seem to have some sort of mystical power over the men, both literally and figuratively. I wonder if Chesnutt wrote them that way on purpose, or if that image of women was and is simply ingrained in our minds.

    ReplyDelete
  4. These are all really interesting points. I think it's very intriguing how a text that isn't inherently sexist, in terms of its message or abstract content, can still fail to use women as anything more than a device. Obviously all characters in stories are 'devices', but you're absolutely right, the women in these stories seem to be even more mechanical and two dimensional than the male characters.

    ReplyDelete