Witnessing a character’s life after the plot is a common
feature of many novels of the 19th century. In most cases, the last
chapter was more of an epilogue than anything else. It feels like everyone
wanted a sense of closure for every single character. It also often reconfirmed
the stance of morality at the time. Were you a good character and managed to
live at the end of the novel? Great, you get a happy ending! You were a
terrible person? Enjoy the bad luck that will follow you around until the day
you die!
Pudd'nhead Wilson fits this typical pattern; “Tom”
(also known as Chambers) was sold into slavery, Roxy repented for all of her
sins until the day she died, and the twins did the sensible thing and moved
back to Italy. All of the other characters are way too minor for us to care
about, right?
As we've mentioned before, Wilson himself is a minor
character in a novel that is named after him. Yet the last we see of him
highlights how minor of a character that he is. The last time readers see Wilson
is after he wins the trial in a spectacular fashion, and readers learn that the
townspeople began to recognize Wilson’s intelligence. Then our focus is
diverted to other characters.
For readers, this doesn’t necessarily give us a satisfying
conclusion. We already know that Wilson's intelligent, and I for one don't hold
out hope that the town will remember to keep Wilson in a favorable light. Not
only that, but one of his friends his dead and the other two are going back to
Italy. Are readers expected to believe that Wilson remains in town as a popular
figurehead?
It's unusual that readers are denied this closure on Wilson.
It's as if Twain didn't care or didn't know himself how Wilson would live on
after the trial. Although that hasn't stopped authors from writing mediocre
endings for their characters before, it's interesting that Twain chooses to
stop as it is.
I think you make a lot of interesting points. It is interesting how so many of the novels we've read have an epilogue-esque final chapter: The Scarlet Letter immediately comes to mind. It must have been a stylistic expectation in the 19th century.
ReplyDelete