The focus on Stowe's abolitionism very much came at the expense of the plot; I had a difficult time following the narrative when huge chunks were elided in favor of footnotes. I found Tom's character especially needed further explanation than I learned through the shortened version. In both instances in which slaves escape (Eliza and Henry, Cassy and Emeline), Tom stays behind to look out for the other slaves. In the instance of Eliza and Henry especially, because it was so early on in the story, I couldn't figure out why Tom decided to stay. It is irrational for two reasons — his self interest, which his lack thereof may be explained by his piousness, but also his interest in Eliza and Henry. Wouldn't they be more safe with the guidance of Tom? In instances such as this, I found myself wanting further explanation which I am sure the 600+ page book provided.
I also found the ending unsatisfying because it came in the form of a footnote. Wrapped up in just one sentence, it seemed like too happy of an ending, almost with the irony of "As You Like It". Though the Norton succeeded in expressing the novel's moral, I felt disappointed in missing so much of the narrative.
In response to your question regarding why Tom decided to stay and be sold to Haley, one of the excerpts told us that Tom knew if he ran away as well, another slave would have been sold in his place. Tom chooses to hope that Eliza and Harry will succeed in their escape and to use his sale to save another slave from having to leave their home and family for most likely a less kind master. Tom would never be willing to allow another slave to suffer because of his actions, and Eliza and Harry may or may not have benefited from his presence.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete